by Former Scout on Sun May 31, 2009 8:44 pm
The “Minny”, on the face of it, is a simple but effective design. It is a tunnel tent with a generous head-height that is pretty-much uniform throughout the length of the tent. The poles are steel which lends the tent great strength and stability in the wind – ours experienced some very strong gusts and it stood tall and straight throughout. It is simple to pitch, though some strength is required to get the pins into the bottom of the steel uprights. The bedroom pods are genuinely 2x2 with sufficient room for a double inflatable mattress in each. Also, the fact that the tent is SIG throughout means that it is warmer in the cold (no drafts) and bug-free.
The Minnesota is the poor-man’s Montana: lower hydrostatic head material, shorter living-area and simplified side door porch; and these compromises are reflected in the lower price. In truth, only one of these compromises creates any real inconvenience: we endured constant, heavy rain and suffered no water ingress and the living area was quite adequate for four. But I do have concerns about the side door.
The first problem with the side door is that the fibreglass pole that is bent to form the canopy puts a lot of stress on the zip and material of and around the door. On my tent this stress even caused damaged to the material where it was stitched to the zip. It should be noted that not everyone has experienced this problem which suggests that this is a quality-control problem rather than a fundamental design flaw - it seems to me that the problem is that the webbed tape that holds the black plastic bracket that holds the end of the fibreglass poles should be shorter; that way the tension from the bent pole is handled by the steel poles and not the fabric and/or the zip. There is, however, a simple, retro solution: use plastic cable ties to more closely align the plastic brackets to the upright steel poles.
The second problem is less easily or cheaply resolved. A major inconvenience of camping in this green and pleasant land of ours is the very stuff that makes it green: rain. Getting in and out of a tent when it is raining can be a comical affair as you try to un-zip the door, get out and re-zip the door quickly so that water does not get into the tent. Do not be fooled into thinking that the canopy over the side door gives any serious protection from the rain; and you certainly can’t leave the side door open while it’s raining unless the door is in the lee of the wind. The front door, because of its slope, is certainly not an alternative. As a result I would seriously consider budgeting for the extension or, at least, Outwell’s canopy or a cheaper, generic alternative (e.g. the Coleman awning). The extension is of much more use than the canopy. It also provides a sheltered cooking area or simply somewhere to sit under sheltered from the sun of the rain. (More on this in another review.) However, assuming that you also purchase the footprint groundsheet and living area carpet you will end up paying a lot more money than you may have first bargained for.
However, I still believe that this is one of the best tents available in its class and price range. Why? Well, the first problem with the side canopy, should you have it, is easily fixed and the second problem is certainly not peculiar to this tent. So what you are left with is a very good, sturdy, spacious tent that four can live in and two or three very comfortably so.
23rd-29th May:- Lanefoot Farm, Keswick. (Good but over-full)
27th-29th July:- Fieldhead Camp Site, Edale. (Good but not for us.)
3rd-7th August:- Studfold Farm, Lofthouse. (Wonderful.)
4th-5th September:- Mandale Farm, nr Bakewell. (Very good)
BUT THAT'S IT FOR THIS YEAR!!